Opening book details…
About this nonfiction
Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept-mapping techniques : concept-map representation of knowledge structures: report of Year 2 activities by Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo; University of California, Los Angeles Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing is a nonfiction available to read on EtoBox.
It is typically read by self-directed learners exploring a subject in depth.
Common subject areas: history, science, philosophy, social sciences.
- Author
- Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo; University of California, Los Angeles Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing
- Publisher
- Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, ©1998.
- Published
- 1998
- Language
- EN
- Category
- nonfiction
More by Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo; University of California, Los Angeles Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing
Similar books
- Young Living: Concept Mapping Activities — Glencoe McGraw-Hill writers (1997)
- The Map Reader : Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic Representation — Dodge M., Kitchin R., Perkins C. (2011)
- Applied Concept Mapping : Capturing, Analyzing, and Organizing Knowledge — Brian Moon; Robert R. Hoffman; Joseph Novak; Alberto Canas (2016)
- On the Cognitive Validity of Interpretations of Scores from Alternative Concept-mapping Techniques — Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo; University of California, Los Angeles Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (1999)
- Teen Health Course 3, Activities, Concept Mapping — Glencoe/McGraw-Hill (2003)
- Map Generalization : Making Rules for Knowledge Representation — edited by Barbara P. Buttenfield, Robert B. McMaster (1991)