About this document
Comparison of Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Effects of Two Different Mandibular Advancement Methods: Conventional Technique Vs Aesthetic Approach by Dr_550585624 is a document available to read on EtoBox.
This study compares the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of two mandibular advancement methods: the conventional twin block (TB) and an aesthetic approach (EA) using Essix plates and Class II elastics. Results showed that while both methods effectively corrected Class II malocclusion, TB resulted in greater forward movement of the mandibular base compared to EA, which primarily affected dentoalveolar structures. The findings suggest that EA may be a suitable alternative for patients with high aesthetic ex
- Author
- Dr_550585624
- Language
- EN