Skip to content

Opening book details…

Can I read Only cervical vertebrae C0-C2, not C3 are relevant for subgrouping migraine patients according to manual palpation and pain provocation: secondary analysis of a cohort study on EtoBox?

Only cervical vertebrae C0-C2, not C3 are relevant for subgrouping migraine patients according to manual palpation and pain provocation: secondary analysis of a cohort study by Annika Schwarz; Kerstin Luedtke; Thomas Schöttker-Königer is a Medicine article available to read on EtoBox.

What is Only cervical vertebrae C0-C2, not C3 are relevant for subgrouping migraine patients according to manual palpation and pain provocation: secondary analysis of a cohort study about?

## Background Subgrouping of migraine patients according to the pain response to manual palpation of the upper cervical spine has been recently described. Based on the neuroanatomy and the convergence of spinal and trigeminal nerves in the trigeminocervical complex, the cervical segments C1 to C3 are potentially relevant. To date it has not been investigated whether palpation results of all upper cervical segments are based on one underlying construct which allows combining the results of several tests. Therefore, the aim of this secondary analysis of a cohort study was to determine whether results from all three segments form one construct. ## Methods Seventy-one migraine patients with chronic or frequent episodic migraine diagnosed according to the international headache society classification version 3 were examined by one physiotherapist. Manual palpation using a posterior to anterior pressure was performed on the upper three cervical vertebrae unilaterally left and right. The results of the palpation according to the patients’ responses were combined using factor analysis. In addition, item response theory (IRT) was used to investigate the structure of the response pattern as

Who reads Only cervical vertebrae C0-C2, not C3 are relevant for subgrouping migraine patients according to manual palpation and pain provocation: secondary analysis of a cohort study?

It is typically read by researchers, students, and practitioners in Medicine.

Author
Annika Schwarz; Kerstin Luedtke; Thomas Schöttker-Königer
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022
Language
EN
Field
Medicine (Health Sciences)

More by Annika Schwarz; Kerstin Luedtke; Thomas Schöttker-Königer

Browse all works by Annika Schwarz; Kerstin Luedtke; Thomas Schöttker-Königer