About this document
Creser vs. Floro: Patent Infringement Case by Silver Anthony Juarez Patoc is a document available to read on EtoBox.
Petitioner Creser filed a case against private respondent Floro claiming infringement of its aerial fuze invention. However, the Court ruled against Creser because (1) Floro was granted a patent for the aerial fuze, while Creser did not have a patent, and (2) in order to file an infringement case, one must either be a patentee or have acquired rights to the patented invention, which Creser did not have. The Court affirmed that without being granted a patent, Creser had no legal basis or cause of action to c
- Author
- Silver Anthony Juarez Patoc
- Language
- EN