Can I read Investigating Cosmological Models and the Hubble Tension using Localized Fast Radio Bursts on EtoBox?

Investigating Cosmological Models and the Hubble Tension using Localized Fast Radio Bursts by Wei, Jun-Jie; Melia, Fulvio is a scholarly article available to read on EtoBox.

What is Investigating Cosmological Models and the Hubble Tension using Localized Fast Radio Bursts about?

We use the dispersion measure (DM) and redshift measurements of 24 localized fast radio bursts (FRBs) to compare cosmological models and investigate the Hubble tension. Setting a flat prior on the DM contribution from the Milky Way's halo, $\mathrm{DM_{halo}^{MW}}\in[5,\;80]\;\mathrm{pc\;cm^{-3}}$, the best fit for flat $\Lambda$CDM is obtained with a Hubble constant $H_0=95.8^{+7.8}_{-9.2}\;\mathrm{km\;s^{-1}\;Mpc^{-1}}$ and a median matter density $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}\approx0.66$. The best fit for the $R_{\mathrm{h}}=ct$ universe is realized with $H_0=94.2^{+5.6}_{-6.2}\;\mathrm{km\;s^{-1}\;Mpc^{-1}}$. We emphasize that the $H_0$ measurement depends sensitively on the $\mathrm{DM_{halo}^{MW}}$ prior. Since flat $\Lambda$CDM has one more free parameter, $R_{\mathrm{h}}=ct$ is favored by the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) with a likelihood of $\sim73\%$ versus $\sim27\%$. Through simulations, we find that if the real cosmology is $\Lambda$CDM, a sample of $\sim1,150$ FRBs in the redshift range $0<z<3$ would be sufficient to rule out $R_{\mathrm{h}}=ct$ at a $3\sigma$ confidence level, while $\sim550$ FRBs would be necessary to rule out $\Lambda$CDM if the real cosmology is in

Author

Wei, Jun-Jie; Melia, Fulvio

Published

2023

Language

EN