Can I read Ratio-based and Net Benefit-based Approaches to Health Care Resource Allocation: Proofs of Optimality and Equivalence on EtoBox?

Ratio-based and Net Benefit-based Approaches to Health Care Resource Allocation: Proofs of Optimality and Equivalence by Eugene M. Laska; Morris Meisner; Carole Siegel; Aaron A. Stinnett is a Economics, Econometrics and Finance article available to read on EtoBox.

What is Ratio-based and Net Benefit-based Approaches to Health Care Resource Allocation: Proofs of Optimality and Equivalence about?

Both incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and net benefits have been proposed as summary measures for use in cost-effectiveness analyses. We present a unifying proof of the optimality and equivalence of ICER-and net benefit-based approaches to the health resource allocation problem, including both 'fixed budget' and 'fixed price' decision rules. If internally consistent willingness-to-pay values are used, ratio-and net benefit-based decision rules identify the same optimal allocation. Because they have identical resource allocation implications, use of one or other of the two approaches must be based on other criteria, such as their behaviour under conditions of uncertainty.

Who reads Ratio-based and Net Benefit-based Approaches to Health Care Resource Allocation: Proofs of Optimality and Equivalence?

Author

Eugene M. Laska; Morris Meisner; Carole Siegel; Aaron A. Stinnett

Publisher

John Wiley and Sons; Wiley (John Wiley & Sons); John Wiley & Sons Inc.; Wiley (ISSN 1057-9230)

Published

1999

Language

EN

Field

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (Social Sciences)