Can I read Micropulse vs. Conventional Laser for CSC on EtoBox?

Micropulse vs. Conventional Laser for CSC by fmillards is a document available to read on EtoBox.

What is Micropulse vs. Conventional Laser for CSC about?

This study compares the effectiveness and safety of 577-nm subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) and conventional laser (CL) for treating acute central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) in 110 patients. While SML showed lower complete resolution of subretinal fluid at 3 months compared to CL, both treatments were similarly effective in improving retinal anatomy and function at 6 months, with SML causing significantly less retinal damage. The findings suggest SML as a viable alternative to CL for acute CSC treatm

Author

fmillards

Language

EN