About this document

Oral Argument Motion in Hollister v. Obama is a document available to read on EtoBox.

This document is a motion for oral argument in an appeal regarding a Rule 11 sanction against the appellant. It argues that oral argument must be granted according to the rules unless the case meets one of three standards for denying it. It claims the appeal is not frivolous, as the original sanction sought was greatly reduced but still imposed without a required hearing. It maintains questions about alleged misrepresentations in appellee briefs require addressing and none of the standards for denying oral

Language

EN