Can I read A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Adherence Measures in Asthma: Which Questionnaire Is Most Useful in Clinical Practice? on EtoBox?

A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Adherence Measures in Asthma: Which Questionnaire Is Most Useful in Clinical Practice? by Sophia Quirke-McFarlane; John Weinman; Gráinne d’Ancona is a Medicine article available to read on EtoBox.

What is A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Adherence Measures in Asthma: Which Questionnaire Is Most Useful in Clinical Practice? about?

Background Suboptimal adherence to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in asthma is a worryingly prevalent yet modifiable factor in uncontrolled disease. Several objective measures of adherence exist, but they are time consuming. The use of patient-reported adherence measures (PRAMs) could therefore offer a time-efficient pragmatic approach to adherence assessment in clinical practice and potentially the appropriate interventions to improve it. Objectives To identify the PRAMs available for asthma and assess their psychometric quality, accessibility and usefulness in clinical practice. Moreover, to provide recommendations for clinicians based on the aforementioned findings. Methods A systematic review of six databases was conducted. Articles included in this study were: English language full-text original asthma-specific PRAMs or development/validation studies of a generic PRAM that had been administered to adults with asthma; investigated ICS adherence in adults (≥18 years old); and assessed at least one COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) measurement property. Results 15 PRAM developmental and/or validation studies were included in this

Who reads A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Adherence Measures in Asthma: Which Questionnaire Is Most Useful in Clinical Practice??

Author

Sophia Quirke-McFarlane; John Weinman; Gráinne d’Ancona

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Published

2023

Language

EN

Field

Medicine (Health Sciences)