Skip to content

Opening book details…

Can I read Acceptance and safety of femoral versus radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): results from a large monitor-controlled German registry (QuIK) on EtoBox?

Acceptance and safety of femoral versus radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): results from a large monitor-controlled German registry (QuIK) by Jörg Reifart; Stefan Göhring; Alexander Albrecht; Winfried Haerer; Benny Levenson; Gerd Ringwald; Patrick Gärtner; Nicolaus Reifart is a Medicine article available to read on EtoBox.

What is Acceptance and safety of femoral versus radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): results from a large monitor-controlled German registry (QuIK) about?

## Abstract ## Background In 2015 and 2018, European Society of Cardiology guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) favoring radial access over femoral access were published. These recommendations were based on randomized trials suggesting that patients treated radially experienced reduced bleeding complications and all-cause mortality. We aimed to assess acceptance and results of radial access in a real-world scenario by analyzing all PCI cases in the Quality Assurance in Invasive Cardiology (QuIK) registry. ## Methods The QuIK registry prospectively collects data on all diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures from 148 private practice cardiology centers in Germany. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACE) were defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, or death during hospitalization. ## Results From 2012 to 2018, 189,917 patients underwent PCI via either access method. The rate of radial approach steadily increased from 13 to 49%. The groups did not differ significantly with respect to age or extent of coronary disease. Femoral approach was significantly more common in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.

Who reads Acceptance and safety of femoral versus radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): results from a large monitor-controlled German registry (QuIK)?

It is typically read by researchers, students, and practitioners in Medicine.

Author
Jörg Reifart; Stefan Göhring; Alexander Albrecht; Winfried Haerer; Benny Levenson; Gerd Ringwald; Patrick Gärtner; Nicolaus Reifart
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022
Language
EN
Field
Medicine (Health Sciences)

More by Jörg Reifart; Stefan Göhring; Alexander Albrecht; Winfried Haerer; Benny Levenson; Gerd Ringwald; Patrick Gärtner; Nicolaus Reifart

Browse all works by Jörg Reifart; Stefan Göhring; Alexander Albrecht; Winfried Haerer; Benny Levenson; Gerd Ringwald; Patrick Gärtner; Nicolaus Reifart