About this document
Christopher Neil Pape V Minolta Limited Another 2022KEELC696 (KLR) by 254duncan is a document available to read on EtoBox.
The 2nd Defendant/Applicant sought to have the suit against him struck out, claiming misjoinder and lack of a cause of action. The court found that the Plaintiff had raised serious allegations of fraud against the 2nd Defendant, which warranted his presence in the case for effective adjudication. Consequently, the court ruled that the suit against the 2nd Defendant should not be struck out, as it disclosed a reasonable cause of action.
- Author
- 254duncan
- Language
- EN