Skip to content

Opening book details…

Can I read The clinical impact of CT for blunt abdominal trauma: Wing VW, Federle MP, Morris JA Jr, et al Am J Roentgen 145:1191–1194 Dec 1985 on EtoBox?

The clinical impact of CT for blunt abdominal trauma: Wing VW, Federle MP, Morris JA Jr, et al Am J Roentgen 145:1191–1194 Dec 1985 by Kenneth Facter is a Medicine article available to read on EtoBox.

What is The clinical impact of CT for blunt abdominal trauma: Wing VW, Federle MP, Morris JA Jr, et al Am J Roentgen 145:1191–1194 Dec 1985 about?

plored and required surgical intervention. DPL was positive in all five; CT was' positive in two of the five (40%). Seven of nine laparotomies in the 35 stab wounds required surgical repair. DPL criteria were positive in all 7; CT was positive in 1 of the 7 patients (14%). DPL and CT both had one false positive study leading to unnecessary laparotomy. The overall sensitivity for DPL was 100% versus 25% for CT. Specificity was 98.9% for both DPL and CT. The authors conclude that in their experience DPL was the most i accurate method of determining the need for laparotomy in trauma patients and they urge caution on relying on CT alone for evaluating trauma. ## Steven M Chernow, MD arteritis, giant cell Giant cell arteritis, Multicenter study of 100 cases with positive biopsy

Who reads The clinical impact of CT for blunt abdominal trauma: Wing VW, Federle MP, Morris JA Jr, et al Am J Roentgen 145:1191–1194 Dec 1985?

It is typically read by researchers, students, and practitioners in Medicine.

Author
Kenneth Facter
Publisher
Elsevier Science; Elsevier ; Mosby Inc.; Elsevier BV (ISSN 1097-6760)
Published
1986
Language
EN
Field
Medicine (Health Sciences)

More by Kenneth Facter

Browse all works by Kenneth Facter