About this document

Conde vs. Court of Appeals Case Summary by Ira Francia Alcazar is a document available to read on EtoBox.

Petitioner Dominga Conde and others sold land to the Alteras with a right to repurchase within 10 years. After 10 years, a new agreement was required if the land was not repurchased. Paciente Cordero, the son-in-law of the Alteras, signed a document stating he received payment to repurchase the land, though neither of the Alteras signed. The Court of Appeals ruled against Conde, stating Cordero was not authorized to act on behalf of the Alteras. The Supreme Court ruled that an implied agency was created by

Author

Ira Francia Alcazar

Language

EN