About this document
Disbursement Acceleration Program Analysis by Yen055 is a document available to read on EtoBox.
The Supreme Court ruled the following: 1) The DAP program itself did not violate the constitutional requirement for appropriations by Congress. However, 2) Transfers of funds between branches (Executive to Legislative) and to projects not provided for in the budget were unconstitutional. 3) Funds withdrawn from slow projects could not be considered "savings" as defined by law. 4) The effects of the DAP would stand due to the doctrine of operative fact, but authors could still face liability for acting in
- Author
- Yen055
- Language
- EN