About this document
Rivera v. Chua: Promissory Note Dispute by Ramil Garcia is a document available to read on EtoBox.
This document summarizes a Supreme Court case involving a promissory note. The respondent Rodrigo Rivera obtained a loan from the petitioners Spouses Salvador and Violeta Chua in 1995, signing a promissory note to pay back P120,000 plus 5% monthly interest. Rivera did not pay by the deadline. The lower courts ruled the promissory note was valid and authentic, and ordered Rivera to pay the principal, interest, and attorney
- Author
- Ramil Garcia
- Language
- EN