About this document

Uy JR vs. CA by JL A H-Dimaculangan is a document available to read on EtoBox.

1. This case involved two civil cases regarding properties seized under a writ of preliminary attachment. A third party claimant asserted ownership of the properties. 2. The Court ruled that properties belonging to a third party that were seized without permission cannot be considered under custodia legis and are not protected from interference by another court. 3. Properties subject to attachment and execution must belong to the judgment debtor. A third party claim over seized properties should be addres

Author

JL A H-Dimaculangan

Language

EN