Can I read Maxillary Protraction: BAMP vs. RME/FM on EtoBox?

Maxillary Protraction: BAMP vs. RME/FM by Beatriz Chileno is a document available to read on EtoBox.

What is Maxillary Protraction: BAMP vs. RME/FM about?

The study compared the effects of two protocols for treating Class III malocclusions in prepubertal patients: bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask (RME/FM) therapy. 21 patients underwent BAMP using miniplate-retained elastics, while 34 patients received RME/FM. Cephalometric records before and after about 1 year of treatment were compared. The BAMP protocol produced significantly greater maxillary advancement (2-3mm more) and better control of vertical chan

Author

Beatriz Chileno

Language

EN