Can I read Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale on EtoBox?

Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale by Matthew D. Lieberman; William A. Cunningham is a Neuroscience article available to read on EtoBox.

What is Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale about?

Statistical thresholding (i.e. P-values) in fMRI research has become increasingly conservative over the past decade in an attempt to diminish Type I errors (i.e. false alarms) to a level traditionally allowed in behavioral science research. In this article, we examine the unintended negative consequences of this single-minded devotion to Type I errors: increased Type II errors (i.e. missing true effects), a bias toward studying large rather than small effects, a bias toward observing sensory and motor processes rather than complex cognitive and affective processes and deficient meta-analyses. Power analyses indicate that the reductions in acceptable P-values over time are producing dramatic increases in the Type II error rate. Moreover, the push for a mapwide false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05 is based on the assumption that this is the FDR in most behavioral research; however, this is an inaccurate assessment of the conventions in actual behavioral research. We report simulations demonstrating that combined intensity and cluster size thresholds such as P < 0.005 with a 10 voxel extent produce a desirable balance between Types I and II error rates. This joint threshold produces hig

Who reads Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale?

Author

Matthew D. Lieberman; William A. Cunningham

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Published

2009

Language

EN

Field

Neuroscience (Life Sciences)