About this document

De Castro v. Court of Appeals Case Summary by wuplawschool is a document available to read on EtoBox.

The Supreme Court ruled that the complaint did not need to be dismissed for failure to implead other co-owners as indispensable parties. While there were four co-owners of the property, the defendant Constante de Castro had appointed the plaintiff Artigo as the real estate agent to sell the property on behalf of all co-owners. Under the Civil Code, this created solidary liability among the co-owners for obligations arising from the agency. As solidary obligors, the plaintiff could recover compensation from

Author

wuplawschool

Language

EN