Can I read Reliability and validity of 2-dimensional video analysis for a running task: A systematic review on EtoBox?

Reliability and validity of 2-dimensional video analysis for a running task: A systematic review by Craig P. Hensley; Dena Kontos; Carly Feldman; Q. Eileen Wafford; Alexis Wright; Alison H. Chang is a Medicine article available to read on EtoBox.

What is Reliability and validity of 2-dimensional video analysis for a running task: A systematic review about?

## Objective: Evaluate the reliability and validity of 2-dimensional (2d) video-based motion analysis during running. ## Methods: A systematic search of medline, cochrane library, embase, cinahl, pedro, sportdiscus, and ieee xplore was conducted in march 2020 and updated in may 2021. we included studies assessing reliability and/or validity of 2d video-based motion analysis (gold standard: 3d motion analysis) during running. ## Results: 11 studies (251 runners; mean age range: 18.7-37.0 years; 57.4% female; 63.7% injury-free) met inclusion criteria. eight studies examined kinematics of the pelvis/hip, eight of the knee, and six of the ankle/foot. low-to-moderate risk of bias was present in all studies. heterogeneous study designs, measurement methods, and statistical approaches across studies precluded statistical synthesis. intrarater reliability [interclass correlation coefficient (icc) range: 0.56-1.00; kappa range: 0.49-0.81] was better than interrater reliability (icc range: 0.31-1.00; kappa range 0.00-0.85). icc values for validity were poor to good (0.06-0.89). one study examining foot strike pattern found good to excellent validity (using gwet ac statistics) when movement k

Who reads Reliability and validity of 2-dimensional video analysis for a running task: A systematic review?

Author

Craig P. Hensley; Dena Kontos; Carly Feldman; Q. Eileen Wafford; Alexis Wright; Alison H. Chang

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Published

2022

Language

EN

Field

Medicine (Health Sciences)