About this document
Nolasco v. Pano: Search Warrant Ruling by iseyyea is a document available to read on EtoBox.
1. The petitioners challenged the validity of a search warrant that was issued to search the premises of one of the petitioners who was accused of rebellion. 2. The Supreme Court ruled that the search warrant was a general warrant as the items to be seized were vaguely described without particularity, giving the searching officers too much discretion. 3. However, the Court initially ruled that while the search warrant was invalid, the items seized did not need to be returned as the search of the accused
- Author
- iseyyea
- Language
- EN