Skip to content

Opening book details…

Can I read Comparison of central corneal thickness using non-contact tono-pachymeter (Tonopachy) with ultrasound pachymetry in normal children and in children with refractive error on EtoBox?

Comparison of central corneal thickness using non-contact tono-pachymeter (Tonopachy) with ultrasound pachymetry in normal children and in children with refractive error by Kavitha Srinivasan; Kiruthikadevi Thiagarajan; Keerthi Gayam; Venkatesh Rengaraj is a Medicine article available to read on EtoBox.

What is Comparison of central corneal thickness using non-contact tono-pachymeter (Tonopachy) with ultrasound pachymetry in normal children and in children with refractive error about?

## Purpose: To compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by non-contact tono-pachymeter [Tonopachy (TP)] with the gold standard ultrasound pachymetry (UP) in normal children and in children with refractive error. ## Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 95 normal children (190 eyes) and 123 children with refractive error (246 eyes), a total of 218 children (436 eyes) aged 7-15 years. After refraction and complete ophthalmic evaluation, axial length was measured with IOLMaster 700, CCT was measured with TP followed by UP. The correlation between the CCT measurements obtained with the two methods was analysed by Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the limits of agreement were assessed with Bland-Altman analysis plot. ## Results: Mean CCT measured with TP was 537.46 ± 36.41 μm and by UP was 537.17 ± 39.80 μm in normal children (__P__ = 0.79) and in refractive error group, the mean CCT was 533.50 ± 34.91 μm by TP and 531.60 ± 36.30 μm by UP (__P__ = 0.04). The 95% limits of agreement between TP and UP ranged from -19.2 to + 21.6 μm (mean = 1.20) for total children, -20.8 to + 21.4 μm (mean = 0.29) for normal group and -18.0 to + 21.8 μm (mean = 1.90) for refr

Who reads Comparison of central corneal thickness using non-contact tono-pachymeter (Tonopachy) with ultrasound pachymetry in normal children and in children with refractive error?

It is typically read by researchers, students, and practitioners in Medicine.

Author
Kavitha Srinivasan; Kiruthikadevi Thiagarajan; Keerthi Gayam; Venkatesh Rengaraj
Published
2021
Language
EN
Field
Medicine (Health Sciences)

More by Kavitha Srinivasan; Kiruthikadevi Thiagarajan; Keerthi Gayam; Venkatesh Rengaraj

Browse all works by Kavitha Srinivasan; Kiruthikadevi Thiagarajan; Keerthi Gayam; Venkatesh Rengaraj