About this document

Dissent on G.R. No. 236628 Interpretation by Dennis Mendoza is a document available to read on EtoBox.

This dissenting opinion discusses two key issues: 1) The meaning of the clause "but not covered by the [RPC]" in Section 10(a) of RA 7610. The Justice agrees with the ponencia that this refers to acts punished under Article 59 of PD 603 that have no counterpart in the RPC, specifically paragraphs 6, 10, and 11, in order to increase penalties for acts involving child abuse. 2) The distinction between Section 3(b)(1) and 3(b)(2) of RA 7610. Section 3(b)(1), 3(b)(3), and 3(b)(4) require only proof of gener

Author

Dennis Mendoza

Language

EN