Skip to content

Opening book details…

Can I read Host protection against deliberate bacterial contamination of an extracellular matrix bioscaffold versus DacronTM mesh in a dog model of orthopedic soft tissue repair on EtoBox?

Host protection against deliberate bacterial contamination of an extracellular matrix bioscaffold versus DacronTM mesh in a dog model of orthopedic soft tissue repair by Stephen F. Badylak; Ching Ching Wu; Melissa Bible; Edward McPherson is a Medicine article available to read on EtoBox.

What is Host protection against deliberate bacterial contamination of an extracellular matrix bioscaffold versus DacronTM mesh in a dog model of orthopedic soft tissue repair about?

## Abstract The resistance of two biomaterials, one synthetic and one biologic in origin, to deliberate bacterial infection was compared in a dog model of orthopedic soft tissue reconstruction. Twenty‐four adult female dogs were randomly divided into two equal groups and a 2.0‐cm‐round full‐thickness defect was created on the lateral surface of the stifle joint, leaving only the synovium and skin intact. The defect was surgically repaired with either DacronTM mesh or a porcine derived extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold material. The repair site was inoculated with 1 × 10^8^ __Staphylococcus aureus__ at the time of surgery and the dogs were survived for 28 days. Results showed a chronic pyogranulomatous inflammatory response at the DacronTM implant sites versus a constructive tissue‐remodeling response without residual inflammation at the ECM implant site. Three dogs in the group receiving the DacronTM mesh were treated with KeflexTM (500 mg bid × 7 days) for signs of septicemia. A quantitative bacterial count of the implant sites at the time of sacrifice showed 6.52 × 10^5^ ± 1.2 × 10^6^ and 6.5 × 10^2^ ± 1.8 × 10^3^ bacteria per gram of tissue for the DacronTM and ECM scaffold si

Who reads Host protection against deliberate bacterial contamination of an extracellular matrix bioscaffold versus DacronTM mesh in a dog model of orthopedic soft tissue repair?

It is typically read by researchers, students, and practitioners in Medicine.

Author
Stephen F. Badylak; Ching Ching Wu; Melissa Bible; Edward McPherson
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons; Wiley (John Wiley & Sons); Heterocorporation; Wiley (ISSN 0021-9304)
Published
2003
Language
EN
Field
Medicine (Health Sciences)

More by Stephen F. Badylak; Ching Ching Wu; Melissa Bible; Edward McPherson

Browse all works by Stephen F. Badylak; Ching Ching Wu; Melissa Bible; Edward McPherson