Can I read Gonzalez vs Kalaw Katigbak Case Summary on EtoBox?

Gonzalez vs Kalaw Katigbak Case Summary by bobbyricky is a document available to read on EtoBox.

What is Gonzalez vs Kalaw Katigbak Case Summary about?

The Supreme Court ruled that there was no double jeopardy in the case of Agapito Gonzales who was charged with violating both Section 7 of RA 3060 for exhibiting a motion picture without approval from the Board of Censors and Article 201 of the RPC for exhibiting obscene motion pictures. The Court found that the elements of the two offenses were different - RA 3060 prohibits exhibition without approval while Article 201 prohibits exhibition of obscene content. Additionally, all requisites for double jeopard

Author

bobbyricky

Language

EN