Can I read On the Good Reliability of an Interval-based Metric to Validate Prediction Uncertainty for Machine Learning Regression Tasks on EtoBox?

On the Good Reliability of an Interval-based Metric to Validate Prediction Uncertainty for Machine Learning Regression Tasks by Pernot, Pascal is a scholarly article available to read on EtoBox.

What is On the Good Reliability of an Interval-based Metric to Validate Prediction Uncertainty for Machine Learning Regression Tasks about?

This short study presents an opportunistic approach to a (more) reliable validation method for prediction uncertainty average calibration. Considering that variance-based calibration metrics (ZMS, NLL, RCE...) are quite sensitive to the presence of heavy tails in the uncertainty and error distributions, a shift is proposed to an interval-based metric, the Prediction Interval Coverage Probability (PICP). It is shown on a large ensemble of molecular properties datasets that (1) sets of z-scores are well represented by Student's-$t(\nu)$ distributions, $\nu$ being the number of degrees of freedom; (2) accurate estimation of 95 $\%$ prediction intervals can be obtained by the simple $2\sigma$ rule for $\nu>3$; and (3) the resulting PICPs are more quickly and reliably tested than variance-based calibration metrics. Overall, this method enables to test 20 $\%$ more datasets than ZMS testing. Conditional calibration is also assessed using the PICP approach.

Author

Pernot, Pascal

Published

2024

Language

EN