Can I read ABSTRACT WITHDRAWN on EtoBox?

ABSTRACT WITHDRAWN is a scholarly article available to read on EtoBox.

What is ABSTRACT WITHDRAWN about?

The unadjusted odds for achieving clinical pregnancy were 40% lower in TFI/IUI compared to IdI/IUI cycles (OR (95%CI): 0.61 [0.38-0.96], p<0.05, for TFI/IUI vs. IdI/IUI). Results did not change when adjusting for maternal age and BMI (adjOR (95%CI): 0.61 [0.38-0.96], p<0.05). NVPRs were comparable between the two groups (16% vs 10.8%, respectfully, adjOR (95%CI): 1.08 [0.87-1.35]). However, as expected, when TFI/IUI cycles were compared to IdI ones, the odds for an ectopic pregnancy were 62% higher (12.0% vs 1.2%, respectfully, aOR [95% CI]:1.62 [1.20-2.19], p<0.01). When analysis was restricted to gonadotropin/IUI cycles (79.5% of TFI/ IUI and 62.7% of IdI/IUI cycles) results were similar but differences in CPR were attenuated (10.3% vs 14.7%, p1⁄40.08). No significant difference was found regarding CPR, NVPR or ectopic rate between the TFI/IUI and IdI/IUI groups (Table 1). TFI/IUI cycles that used oral pills for OI had limited cases for statistical comparison with IdI/IUI cycles CONCLUSIONS: Overall, IUI as management for a patient with a unilateral tubal disease leads to a lower chance of clinical pregnancy and higher chance of ectopic pregnancy when compared to patients with id

Publisher

Elsevier Science; Elsevier ; Elsevier BV (ISSN 1556-5653)

Published

2020

Language

EN