About this document

Laurel v. Abrogar: Theft and Asportation by westernwound82 is a document available to read on EtoBox.

1) The Supreme Court ruled that any personal property, whether tangible or intangible, can be the object of theft if it is capable of appropriation. 2) Personal property is defined in the Civil Code as anything that can be appropriated and is not real property. The term in the Penal Code should be interpreted this way. 3) Theft does not require carrying away the object, as long as the owner is unlawfully deprived of possession. International long distance calls consist of electrical impulses, which are

Author

westernwound82

Language

EN