Can I read ClinicalOralImplantsRes 2024 Cheng AccuracyofedentulousfullarchimplantimpressionAninvitrocomparison on EtoBox?

ClinicalOralImplantsRes 2024 Cheng AccuracyofedentulousfullarchimplantimpressionAninvitrocomparison by guismael is a document available to read on EtoBox.

What is ClinicalOralImplantsRes 2024 Cheng AccuracyofedentulousfullarchimplantimpressionAninvitrocomparison about?

This study compares the accuracy of four implant impression techniques for edentulous full-arch prostheses: conventional impression, intraoral scanning with and without splinting, and stereophotogrammetry. Results indicate that stereophotogrammetry provides superior trueness and precision, while intraoral scanning methods showed similar accuracy to conventional impressions but with some deviations. The addition of a splint did not enhance the accuracy of intraoral scanning techniques.

Author

guismael

Language

EN