About this document

Estrada v. Sandiganbayan Overview by RmLyn Mclnao is a document available to read on EtoBox.

1) The petitioner Joseph Estrada challenged the constitutionality of the Anti-Plunder Law, claiming it was vague and violated due process. 2) The Supreme Court ruled that the law was not unconstitutionally vague as the terms used have common definitions and legislative intent was clear. 3) The Court also found the law did not violate the right to know the nature of accusations, as the prosecution still needs to prove beyond reasonable doubt that a pattern of criminal acts was committed to unjustly enric

Author

RmLyn Mclnao

Language

EN