About this document

Serrano vs. Court of Appeals, 417 SCRA 415, December 10, 2003 by TNVTRL is a document available to read on EtoBox.

This document discusses a case where a contract for sale of property was rescinded by the court due to supervening facts. The court found that equity prevents the respondents from benefitting from wrongdoing and that execution of the final judgment should be stayed due to new circumstances. The petitioners are entitled to reimbursement for expenses from respondents.

Author

TNVTRL

Language

EN