Opening book details…
Can I read Remote administration of physical performance tests among persons with and without a cancer history: Establishing reliability and agreement with in-person assessment on EtoBox?
Remote administration of physical performance tests among persons with and without a cancer history: Establishing reliability and agreement with in-person assessment by Carolyn Guidarelli; Colin Lipps; Sydnee Stoyles; Nathan F. Dieckmann; Kerri M. Winters-Stone is a Medicine article available to read on EtoBox.
What is Remote administration of physical performance tests among persons with and without a cancer history: Establishing reliability and agreement with in-person assessment about?
Objectives: To assess the reliability of using videoconference technology to remotely administer the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), including the 5-time sit-to-stand (5XSTS) and usual 4-m walk (4mWT), and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests and agreement with in-person administration among adults with and without cancer. Methods: Participants from two ongoing clinical exercise trials in cancer survivors, one that included partners without cancer, comprised the available sample (n = 176; mean age 62.5 ± 11.5 years.). Remote tests were administered on two separate days by either the same or a different assessor to determine intra-rater and interrater reliability, respectively. We also compared tests conducted remotely and in-person using the same assessor and the same participant. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used for all comparisons, except for the SPPB score, which used Cohen's kappa and Krippendorf's alpha for intra-and inter-rater reliability, respectively. Results: Remote assessment of the TUG test had excellent intra-rater reliability (0.98, 95% CI 0.93-0.99), interrater reliability (ICC = 0.96, 95% CI 0.90-0.99),
Who reads Remote administration of physical performance tests among persons with and without a cancer history: Establishing reliability and agreement with in-person assessment?
It is typically read by researchers, students, and practitioners in Medicine.
- Author
- Carolyn Guidarelli; Colin Lipps; Sydnee Stoyles; Nathan F. Dieckmann; Kerri M. Winters-Stone
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022
- Language
- EN
- Field
- Medicine (Health Sciences)