About this document
Rakkab by Kim Ecarma is a document available to read on EtoBox.
This document discusses four arguments made by Rakkab in response to claims brought by Aurok: 1) Acts by DORTA are not attributable to Rakkab under principles of state responsibility. 2) Harvesting of the yak in Rakkab did not violate its obligations under wildlife treaties or customary international law. 3) Rakkab did not violate cultural or religious rights of Aurok citizens relating to the yak. 4) There was no obligation under international law for Rakkab to ensure benefit sharing with Aurok for us
- Author
- Kim Ecarma
- Language
- EN