Skip to content

Opening book details…

Can I read Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Without Local Anesthesia in Patients With Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on EtoBox?

Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Without Local Anesthesia in Patients With Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials by Jing Lou; Shuai Wang; Shuitao Liu; Gengyan Xing is a Medicine article available to read on EtoBox.

What is Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Without Local Anesthesia in Patients With Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials about?

Objective: The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis without local anesthesia. Methods: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to September 2015 for randomized controlled trials comparing ESWT without local anesthesia versus placebo for treatment of plantar fasciitis in adults. The primary outcome was the 12-week post-intervention success rate of reducing the visual analog scale score by 60% from baseline at the first step in the morning, reducing the VAS score by 60% from baseline during daily activities, reducing the Roles and Maudsley score, reducing overall heel pain, and reducing pain after applying a force meter. Results: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, ESWT significantly improved the success rate of reducing overall heel pain, reducing the VAS score by 60% at the first step in the morning and during daily activities, improving the Roles and Maudsley score to excellent or good, and reducing heel pain after application of a pressure meter. Conclusions: ESWT seems to be

Who reads Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Without Local Anesthesia in Patients With Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials?

It is typically read by researchers, students, and practitioners in Medicine.

Author
Jing Lou; Shuai Wang; Shuitao Liu; Gengyan Xing
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2016
Language
EN
Field
Medicine (Health Sciences)

More by Jing Lou; Shuai Wang; Shuitao Liu; Gengyan Xing

Browse all works by Jing Lou; Shuai Wang; Shuitao Liu; Gengyan Xing