Can I read Longevity of Direct vs. Indirect Composites on EtoBox?

Longevity of Direct vs. Indirect Composites by mmargaretha192 is a document available to read on EtoBox.

What is Longevity of Direct vs. Indirect Composites about?

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the longevity of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth, finding that direct restorations had a significantly lower annual failure rate than indirect restorations. A total of five randomized controlled trials were included, revealing that indirect restorations had failure rates ranging from 0% to 15.5%, while direct restorations ranged from 0% to 5.4%. The study concluded that both types of restorations are viable for large class II ca

Author

mmargaretha192

Language

EN