Skip to content

Opening book details…

Can I read Comparison of Two Digital Radiostereometric Analysis Methods in the Determination of Femoral Head Penetration in a Total Hip Replacement Phantom on EtoBox?

Comparison of Two Digital Radiostereometric Analysis Methods in the Determination of Femoral Head Penetration in a Total Hip Replacement Phantom by Charles R. Bragdon; Daniel M. Estok; Henrik Malchau; Johan Kärrholm; Xunhua Yuan; Robert Bourne; Jean Veldhoven; William H. Harris is a Medicine article available to read on EtoBox.

What is Comparison of Two Digital Radiostereometric Analysis Methods in the Determination of Femoral Head Penetration in a Total Hip Replacement Phantom about?

## Abstract Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) has been used extensively to evaluate the magnitude and direction of penetration of the femoral head into the acetabular component of a total hip replacement as a result of polyethylene wear and creep. The accuracy and precision of an RSA study depends on several factors, including the radiographic technique, the analytical software, and the positioning of the tantalum markers. This study had three sequential purposes. First, an in vitro phantom model was used to quantify the accuracy and precision of digital images versus conventional radiography in RSA measurements of penetration of the femoral head into the acetabular shell in a total hip replacement. The Umeå RSA software package was used for analysis of both the conventional films, which were digitized at a resolution of 300 DPI, and digital radiographs, which were converted from a DICOM format at a resolution of 218 DPI. Digital radiography was found to be superior. Next, two methods of RSA analysis currently in use for determining femoral head penetration into polyethylene of total joint replacements were compared. Using the phantom model, we compared the Umeå RSA system (Biomedic

Who reads Comparison of Two Digital Radiostereometric Analysis Methods in the Determination of Femoral Head Penetration in a Total Hip Replacement Phantom?

It is typically read by researchers, students, and practitioners in Medicine.

Author
Charles R. Bragdon; Daniel M. Estok; Henrik Malchau; Johan Kärrholm; Xunhua Yuan; Robert Bourne; Jean Veldhoven; William H. Harris
Publisher
Elsevier Science; Wiley (John Wiley & Sons); Wiley-Blackwell; Wiley (ISSN 0736-0266)
Published
2004
Language
EN
Field
Medicine (Health Sciences)

More by Charles R. Bragdon; Daniel M. Estok; Henrik Malchau; Johan Kärrholm; Xunhua Yuan; Robert Bourne; Jean Veldhoven; William H. Harris

Browse all works by Charles R. Bragdon; Daniel M. Estok; Henrik Malchau; Johan Kärrholm; Xunhua Yuan; Robert Bourne; Jean Veldhoven; William H. Harris