About this document

Figal 2014 Response To Crowell and Dahlstrom by selim corekci is a document available to read on EtoBox.

According to my argument, the distinction between mediated and immediate presence, between showing and self-showing, is confirmed by the preliminary character of interpretation. Dahlstrom has touched also on this point. He wonders about my statement that no interpretation exhausts the object to which it is devoted. How, so he asks, can we know this, and how can we know that it holds true for all interpretations that are possible of something? How can we know that the interpreted object is not th

Author

selim corekci

Language

EN