About this document

Supreme Court Writ Petition Analysis by chandni babunu is a document available to read on EtoBox.

The petitioners have filed writ petitions challenging a notification by Respondent No. 1 cancelling the mining project of Petitioner No. 1. Petitioner No. 1 claims that the notification violates its fundamental rights and results in loss of profits. Petitioner No. 2 claims loss of employment. The petitioners argue that the notification is invalid as Respondent No. 1 does not have legislative power over minor minerals. They also argue that their rights under Article 21 were violated without principles of

Author

chandni babunu

Language

EN