Can I read Inducing and Mitigating a Self-Reinforcing Degradation in Decision-making Teams on EtoBox?

Inducing and Mitigating a Self-Reinforcing Degradation in Decision-making Teams by Hubbard, Paul; Kott, Alexander; Martin, Michael is a scholarly article available to read on EtoBox.

What is Inducing and Mitigating a Self-Reinforcing Degradation in Decision-making Teams about?

The models in this paper demonstrate how self-reinforcing error due to positive feedback can lead to overload and saturation of decision-making elements, and ultimately the cascading collapse of an organization due to the propagation of overload and erroneous decisions throughout the organization. We begin the paper with an analysis of the stability of the decision-making aspects of command organizations from a system-theoretic perspective. A simple dynamic model shows how an organization can enter into a self-reinforcing cycle of increasing decision workload until the demand for decisions exceeds the decision-making capacity of the organization. We then extend the model to more complex networked organizations and show that they also experience a form of self-reinforcing degradation. In particular, we find that the degradation in decision quality has a tendency to propagate through the hierarchical structure, i.e. overload at one location affects other locations by overloading the higher-level components which then in turn overload their subordinates. Our computational experiments suggest several strategies for mitigating this type of malfunction: dumping excessive load, empowering

Author

Hubbard, Paul; Kott, Alexander; Martin, Michael

Published

2016

Language

EN