Can I read Erratum to: “Hadronization properties of b quarks compared to light quarks in e+e−→qq̄ from 183 to 200 GeV”: [Phys. Lett. B 479 (2000) 118–128] on EtoBox?

Erratum to: “Hadronization properties of b quarks compared to light quarks in e+e−→qq̄ from 183 to 200 GeV”: [Phys. Lett. B 479 (2000) 118–128] is a Physics and Astronomy article available to read on EtoBox.

What is Erratum to: “Hadronization properties of b quarks compared to light quarks in e+e−→qq̄ from 183 to 200 GeV”: [Phys. Lett. B 479 (2000) 118–128] about?

In the paper the sign of all the correlation coefficients is wrongly stated negative, whereas we found them to be all positive. Specifically, in p. 124 after the line "δ bl (183 GeV) = 4.55 ± 1.31" (6th after Eq. ( 3)), it says "with correlation coefficient of -0.45" where it should say instead "with correlation coefficient of +0.45", after the line "δ bl (189 GeV) = 4.43 ± 0.85" it says "with correlation coefficient of -0.52" where it should say instead "with correlation coefficient of +0.52", and finally after the line "δ bl (200 GeV) = 3.39 ± 0.89" it says "with correlation coefficient of -0.52" where it should say instead "with correlation coefficient of +0.52".

Who reads Erratum to: “Hadronization properties of b quarks compared to light quarks in e+e−→qq̄ from 183 to 200 GeV”: [Phys. Lett. B 479 (2000) 118–128]?

Publisher

Elsevier Science; Elsevier ; Elsevier BV (ISSN 0370-2693)

Published

2000

Language

EN

Field

Physics and Astronomy (Physical Sciences)