About this document
CLV 1 Cukc 3 PDJ 6 DLLQP 0 Gifi 73 P by prakashregn is a document available to read on EtoBox.
The court dismissed a petition filed by plaintiffs Madhu and Vivekanandan seeking the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect a disputed property, claiming it was fraudulently sold by the first respondent to the second respondent. The court found that the existence of a house on the property was not in dispute, and that the matter of possession should be established through evidence rather than inspection. Consequently, the petition was deemed unnecessary and dismissed without costs.
- Author
- prakashregn
- Language
- EN