About this document
Dizon v. CA: Agency and Lease Dispute by Evander Arcenal is a document available to read on EtoBox.
The Supreme Court ruled that Alice Dizon did not have valid consent from the petitioners to sell the leased property to Overland Express Lines. While Alice accepted a partial payment and issued a receipt, this did not perfect a contract of sale since the petitioners did not authorize her to act on their behalf regarding the transaction. The Court of Appeals erred in assuming a contract of sale was formed based solely on the failure of the petitioners to deny the receipt. For an agency relationship to exist,
- Author
- Evander Arcenal
- Language
- EN