Can I read Liquidity Risk in Islamic vs Conventional Banks on EtoBox?

Liquidity Risk in Islamic vs Conventional Banks by Nurcholis Muhammad is a document available to read on EtoBox.

What is Liquidity Risk in Islamic vs Conventional Banks about?

This document discusses a comparative study of liquidity risk between Islamic and conventional banks in Indonesia. It hypothesizes relationships between various bank ratios (CAR, ROA, ROE, NIM, liquidity gaps, RLA) and liquidity risk. For conventional banks, the study finds CAR and ROE have a negative influence on liquidity risk, while ROA and RLA have a positive influence. For Islamic banks, NIM and ROE have a positive impact on liquidity risk, while liquidity gaps and RLA have an insignificant effect. The

Author

Nurcholis Muhammad

Language

EN