About this document
Supreme Court Case Analysis: Uy vs. Chua by Asleah Samporna is a document available to read on EtoBox.
1) The Supreme Court ruled that the status and filiation of a child cannot be compromised and that paternity must be judicially established. 2) The court had previously ruled that a case for acknowledgement affecting civil status cannot be the subject of compromise. 3) A compromise agreement regarding the status and filiation of a child would be contrary to law and public policy. No court has the authority to approve a compromise agreement that is illegal.
- Author
- Asleah Samporna
- Language
- EN