About this document

Privacy Rights in Hing v. Choachuy Case by Sofia Domingo is a document available to read on EtoBox.

1. The Supreme Court ruled that the right to privacy under Article 26(1) of the Civil Code is not limited to residences, but can also apply to business offices and other non-residential properties. 2. Spouses Hing alleged that respondents Choachuy illegally installed surveillance cameras facing their property during ongoing construction, violating their right to privacy. 3. While the Court of Appeals said there was no privacy violation because the property was non-residential, the Supreme Court reversed

Author

Sofia Domingo

Language

EN