Skip to content

Opening book details…

Can I read The detection of respiratory syncytial virus in nasopharyngeal aspirates: Assessment, formulation, and evaluation of monoclonal antibodies as a diagnostic reagent on EtoBox?

The detection of respiratory syncytial virus in nasopharyngeal aspirates: Assessment, formulation, and evaluation of monoclonal antibodies as a diagnostic reagent by A. Freke; E. J. Stott; A. P. C. H. Roome; E. O. Caul is a Medicine article available to read on EtoBox.

What is The detection of respiratory syncytial virus in nasopharyngeal aspirates: Assessment, formulation, and evaluation of monoclonal antibodies as a diagnostic reagent about?

Comparisons were made between standard methods of cell culture, indirect immunofluorescence (IF) using hyperimmune respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antiserum, and indirect IF using mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against various epitopes of RSV for the detection of RSV in nasopharyngeal aspirates. The monoclonal antibodies were used singly and in pools of different specificities which in turn were tested in both direct and indirect IF. In a preliminary study, aspirates from 227 infants were examined for RSV by standard methods. The results were compared with the detection of RSV in these aspirates using nine separate monoclonal antibodies and a pool consisting of five monoclonal antibodies. Respiratory syncytial virus was detected in 64 (28%) by cell culture, in 68 (30%) by indirect IF using bovine polyclonal antibody (BPA), and in 75 (33%) by indirect IF using the monoclonal antibody pool. The nine individual monoclonal antibodies when tested separately were less sensitive, detecting between 8 and 77% of all aspirates found to be positive by culture. After statistical analysis of the results obtained in the preliminary study, a refined monoclonal antibody pool was prepared a

Who reads The detection of respiratory syncytial virus in nasopharyngeal aspirates: Assessment, formulation, and evaluation of monoclonal antibodies as a diagnostic reagent?

It is typically read by researchers, students, and practitioners in Medicine.

Author
A. Freke; E. J. Stott; A. P. C. H. Roome; E. O. Caul
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons; Wiley (John Wiley & Sons); John Wiley & Sons Inc.; Wiley; Research Square (ISSN 0146-6615)
Published
1986
Language
EN
Field
Medicine (Health Sciences)

More by A. Freke; E. J. Stott; A. P. C. H. Roome; E. O. Caul

Browse all works by A. Freke; E. J. Stott; A. P. C. H. Roome; E. O. Caul