Skip to content

Opening book details…

Can I read The Continuum Versus Categorical Debate on Eating Disorders: Implications for Counselors on EtoBox?

The Continuum Versus Categorical Debate on Eating Disorders: Implications for Counselors by Linda M. Perosa; Sandra L. Perosa is a Psychology article available to read on EtoBox.

What is The Continuum Versus Categorical Debate on Eating Disorders: Implications for Counselors about?

The authors summarize a study by D. A. Williamson et al. (2002) in which clinical groups with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, eating disorder not otherwise specified, and binge eating disorder were contrasted with nonclinical groups of participants (i.e., obese and normal weight). The eating disorder groups were qualitatively different. Also, bulimia nervosa, purging and nonpurging types, may fall on a continuum of pathology with the binge‐eating, purging type of anorexia. Anorexia nervosa, restricting type, may be distinct from bulimia nervosa, purging and nonpurging types, and the binge‐eating, purging type of anorexia.

Who reads The Continuum Versus Categorical Debate on Eating Disorders: Implications for Counselors?

It is typically read by researchers, students, and practitioners in Psychology.

Author
Linda M. Perosa; Sandra L. Perosa
Publisher
American Counseling Association; Wiley (John Wiley & Sons); Wiley-Blackwell; Wiley (ISSN 1556-6678)
Published
2004
Language
EN
Field
Psychology (Social Sciences)

More by Linda M. Perosa; Sandra L. Perosa

Browse all works by Linda M. Perosa; Sandra L. Perosa