Skip to content

Opening book details…

Can I read False‐positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 in the setting of urgent head and neck surgery and otolaryngologic emergencies during the pandemic: Clinical implications on EtoBox?

False‐positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 in the setting of urgent head and neck surgery and otolaryngologic emergencies during the pandemic: Clinical implications by Andrew P. Katz; Francisco J. Civantos; Zoukaa Sargi; Jason M. Leibowitz; Elizabeth A. Nicolli; Donald Weed; Alexander E. Moskovitz; Alyssa M. Civantos; David M. Andrews; Octavio Martinez; Giovana R. Thomas is a Medicine article available to read on EtoBox.

What is False‐positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 in the setting of urgent head and neck surgery and otolaryngologic emergencies during the pandemic: Clinical implications about?

## Abstract ## Background No reports describe falsepositive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) for novel coronavirus in preoperative screening. ## Methods Preoperative patients had one or two nasopharyngeal swabs, depending on low or high risk of viral transmission. Positive tests were repeated. ## Results Forty‐three of 52 patients required two or more preoperative tests. Four (9.3%) had discrepant results (positive/negative). One of these left the coronavirus disease (COVID) unit against medical advice despite an orbital abscess, with unknown true disease status. The remaining 3 of 42 (7.1%) had negative repeat RT‐PCR. Although ultimately considered falsepositives, one was sent to a COVID unit postoperatively and two had urgent surgery delayed. Assuming negative repeat RT‐PCR, clear chest imaging, and lack of subsequent symptoms represent the “gold standard,” RT‐PCR specificity was 0.97. ## Conclusions If false positives are suspected, we recommend computed tomography (CT) of the chest and repeat RT‐PCR. Validated serum immunoglobulin testing may ultimately prove useful.

Who reads False‐positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 in the setting of urgent head and neck surgery and otolaryngologic emergencies during the pandemic: Clinical implications?

It is typically read by researchers, students, and practitioners in Medicine.

Author
Andrew P. Katz; Francisco J. Civantos; Zoukaa Sargi; Jason M. Leibowitz; Elizabeth A. Nicolli; Donald Weed; Alexander E. Moskovitz; Alyssa M. Civantos; David M. Andrews; Octavio Martinez; Giovana R. Thomas
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020
Language
EN
Field
Medicine (Health Sciences)

More by Andrew P. Katz; Francisco J. Civantos; Zoukaa Sargi; Jason M. Leibowitz; Elizabeth A. Nicolli; Donald Weed; Alexander E. Moskovitz; Alyssa M. Civantos; David M. Andrews; Octavio Martinez; Giovana R. Thomas

Browse all works by Andrew P. Katz; Francisco J. Civantos; Zoukaa Sargi; Jason M. Leibowitz; Elizabeth A. Nicolli; Donald Weed; Alexander E. Moskovitz; Alyssa M. Civantos; David M. Andrews; Octavio Martinez; Giovana R. Thomas