Opening book details…
About this nonfiction
Frank C. Stettler, plaintiff and appellant, vs. Edwin V. O'Hara, Bertha Moores, Amedee M. Smith, constituting the Industrial Welfare Commission of the State of Oregon, defendants and respondents. Appendix to the briefs filed on behalf of respondents. by Brandeis, Louis D., 1856-1941. is a nonfiction available to read on EtoBox.
It is typically read by self-directed learners exploring a subject in depth.
Common subject areas: history, science, philosophy, social sciences.
- Author
- Brandeis, Louis D., 1856-1941.
- Publisher
- [1914]
- Published
- 1914
- Language
- EN
- Category
- nonfiction
More by Brandeis, Louis D., 1856-1941.
Browse all works by Brandeis, Louis D., 1856-1941.
Similar books
- 1913, October term, Frank C. Stettler, plaintiff and appellant, vs. Edwin V. O'Hara, Bertha Moores, Amedee M. Smith, constituting the Industrial Welfare Commission of the State of Oregon, defendants and respondents. Appendix to the briefs filed on behalf of respondents. Prepared by Louis D. Brandeis, assisted by Josephine Goldmark. — Oregon. Supreme Court. (1913)
- Supreme Court of the State of Oregon, October Term, 1913. Frank C. Stettler, Plaintiff and Appellant, Vs. Edwin V. O'Hara, [et Al] Constituting the Industrial Welfare Commission of the State of Oregon, Defendants and Respondents. Appendix to the Briefs Filed on Behalf of Respondents. Assisted by Josephine Goldmark, Publication Secretary, National Consumers' League. — Brandeis, Louis D., 1856-1941. (1914)
- Frank C. Stettler, Plaintiff in Error, Vs. Edwin V. O'Hara, Et Al., Constituting the Industrial Welfare Commission, Defendants in Error. Elmira Simpson, Plaintiff in Error, Vs. Edwin V. O'Hara, Et Al Constituting the Industrial Welfare Commission, Defendants in Error. Brief for Defendant in Error. — Brandeis, Louis Dembitz, 1856-1941. (1914)
- Frank C. Stettler, appellant vs. Edwin V. O'Hara, Bertha Moores and Amedee M. Smith, constituting the Industrial welfare commission of the state of Oregon, respondents : brief of Dan J. Malarkey and E.B. Seabrookfor respondents : appeal from the judgment of the Circuit court for Multnomah County : Hon. T.J. Cleeton, judge : Fulton & Bowerman, attorneys for appellant : A.M. Crawford, attorney… — Dan J. Malarkey (1914)
- In the Supreme Court of Utah Territory: Peter Wilson, plaintiff and appellant, vs. Fred. J. Kiesel, John G. Carnahan, and John C. Anderson, defendants and respondents. Points and authorities for appellant. — Wilson, Peter, (1899)
- In the Supreme Court of the State of California. Helen Gainer, Plaintiff and Appellant Vs. A.B.C. Dohrman, Katherine Philips Edson ... Defendants and Respondents. Brief on Behalf of Amici Curiae Supporting Respondents' Contention ... Felix Frankfurter ... Counsel, Assisted by Mary W. Dewson ... — Frankfurter, Felix, 1882-1965. (1924)