About this document
Hearsay Evidence in South Africa by malingaf75 is a document available to read on EtoBox.
The document discusses the admissibility of extra-curial admissions as hearsay evidence against co-accused in South Africa, focusing on two key cases: S v Ndhlovu and Litako and others v S. The Supreme Court of Appeal initially held in Ndhlovu that such admissions could be admissible based on the credibility of the declarant at the time of the statement, but later in Litako, the court ruled that these admissions are inadmissible against co-accused. The note aims to highlight the implications of these ruling
- Author
- malingaf75
- Language
- EN